Summary
| Foundation Year | 2025 |
| Country | 🇺🇸 United States |
| Founders | David Cramer, Chris Jennings |
| Tier | 100% Free, Freemium, Paid |
| Platforms | Web Browsers |
| AI Features | AI Assistant, AI Auto Bug Fixing, AI Code Enhancer, AI Code Error Detector, AI Coding Assistant |
| Pricing From | $26 |
| Support | Yes (Email, Help Center) |
| Best Used For | Production debugging, root-cause analysis, automated bug fixing Error monitoring, code review, incident investigation, developer productivity |
| Affiliate Program | No |
| White Label | No |
| API | No |
Gallery
Description
Features
- Root Cause Analysis
- AI Bug Detection
- Automatic Fix Suggestions
- Pull Request Generation
- Actionability Scoring
- Stack Trace Analysis
- Trace Analysis
- Log Analysis
- Codebase Analysis
- AI Agent Integrations
Free Plan & Pricing
Refund Policy
5 Ratings
[N/A]
[4.5/5]
5app.ai Rating
[N/A]
AI Review
[4.5/5]
Web reviews are mostly positive. Users praise Sentry for fast error tracking, strong stack traces, source maps, and helpful debugging tools, but some complain about setup complexity, noisy alerts, and pricing uncertainty.
Sources:- Trustpilot.com, Producthunt.com
Our Expert's Opinion
[4.8/5]
I found Seer especially useful because it already had access to the application context I needed for debugging, so I didn't have to manually gather stack traces, logs, commits, and other information. The root-cause analysis made investigating complex errors much faster, and I liked that it could go beyond explaining the problem and actually generate a pull request. The newer integrations with Copilot, Claude, and Cursor make the workflow even more flexible. I would still review every generated fix carefully, especially for production systems. Overall, I’d recommend Seer for teams already using Sentry that want to automate repetitive debugging work.
Videos
User Reviews - 0 reviews
Reviews
Write a ReviewThere are no reviews yet.




